Wildlife species assessment
Assessment process, categories, and guidelinesFootnote 1
Approved by Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) in November 2015
Overview of the COSEWIC ProcessFootnote 1
COSEWIC exists to provide Canadians and their governments with advice regarding the status of wildlife species that are nationally at risk of extinction or extirpation.
The COSEWIC process is divided into three sequential steps, each of which has a tangible outcome. These are detailed below.
- selection of wildlife species requiring assessment - the COSEWIC Candidate List;
- compilation of available data, knowledge and information - the COSEWIC status report; and
- assessment of a wildlife species' risk of extinction or extirpation and subsequent designation - the record of COSEWIC assessment results.
- Candidate wildlife species
- Priority setting for new wildlife species to be assessed
- Status report
- Commissioning new status reports and updates
- Status report review and approval process
- Status assessment and designation
List of Tables
- Table 1. Determining eligibility of wildlife species for status assessment.
- Table 2. Quantitative criteria and guidelines for the status assessment of wildlife species.
- Table 3. Guidelines for modifying status assessment based on rescue effect.
- Table 4. Policy for modifying status assessment based on quantitative criteria.
- Table 5. Status categories.
- Table 6. Definitions associated with quantitative criteria.
Gardenfors, U., J.P .Rodriquez, C. Hilton Taylor, C. Hyslop, G. Mace, S. Molur and S. Poss. 1999. Draft guidelines for the application of Red List criteria at national and regional levels. Species 31 32:58 70
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (2001). IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, U.K. Available at the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species website.
IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. 2016. Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 12. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. Downloadable from the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species website
- Footnote 1
This process is used for new assessments or reassessments based on an updated status reports. The status appraisal assessment process for use with existing status reports appended with appraisal summaries is detailed in Procedures for Reviews of Classification Using Status Appraisal Summaries.
- Date Modified: